Elementary School Flipped Learning STEM Education as a Medium for Engaging and Innovative Learning


  • Kurniawan Arif Maspul University of the People


Flipped Learning, Elementary School, STEM Education, Active Participation, Collaboration, Critical Thinking


In today's quickly changing world, it is critical to provide students with the skills and information needed to flourish in STEM disciplines. Flipped learning, an innovative educational strategy, has gained appeal as a means to increase student engagement and deepen comprehension of STEM disciplines. This article provides a thorough examination of flipped learning in primary school STEM teaching, supported by relevant theories and literature. Flipped learning flips the traditional classroom approach by delivering instructional information outside of class, freeing up in-class time for active learning, hands-on activities, and collaborative problem-solving. The Cognitive Load Theory provides a theoretical underpinning for flipped learning by reducing cognitive load and allowing students to actively interact with difficult STEM subjects. Flipped learning boosts student motivation, critical thinking abilities, and information acquisition in STEM courses, according to research. This study confirms the positive impact of flipped learning on student engagement, critical thinking abilities, and enthusiasm for STEM disciplines in elementary school using a comprehensive methodology that includes literature analysis, classroom observations, and interactions with educators and students. Flipped learning is emerging as a valuable tool for preparing students with the skills they need to excel in STEM professions, encouraging additional investigation and collaboration among educators.


Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education.

Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 23-1200).

Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi delta kappan, 76(8), 597-604.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.

Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Routledge.

Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin press.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1998). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. In Theory and research on small groups (pp. 9-35). Boston, MA: Springer US.

National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. National Academies Press.

Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures.(Trans A. Rosin). Viking.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn London. UK: Free Press.

Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Routledge.

Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning environments research, 15, 171-193.

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational psychology review, 31, 261-292.

Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education next, 12(1), 82-83.

Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.




How to Cite

Maspul, K. A. (2023). Elementary School Flipped Learning STEM Education as a Medium for Engaging and Innovative Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan LLDIKTI Wilayah 1 (JUDIK), 3(2), 44–51. Retrieved from https://lldikti1.kemdikbud.go.id/jurnal/index.php/judik/article/view/410