|PEER REVIEW PROCESS|
|OPEN ACCESS POLICY|
|COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE|
In uniform scientific writing, researchers are expected to be able to follow the template properly. The following are some general instructions related to writing guidelines:
Describes the subject of the script adequately, clearly, precisely, not multiple interpretations, and consists of a maximum of 14 words.
The maximum number of authors is 5 people. The author's name must be written without followed by the title and, include the author's affiliation
1. Abstracts are expected to summarize all the contents of the manuscript starting from the Background, Problems, Methods used in problem-solving, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions obtained
2. The abstract is not permitted to use abbreviations
3. In Abstracts are not permitted to include trademark
4. In the Abstract it is not permitted to contain citations
5. The number of words in the abstract must range between 200-250 words
6. Keyword states the core keywords about the research carried out which contains a minimum of 5 words.
In the introduction, researchers are expected to be able to explain the existing phenomena or background information such as prior work, hypotheses, and problems to be discussed. This is followed by a statement of the purpose of the research issue or problem and/or a set of questions you attempt to answer in your research
A literature review is a critical, analytical summary and synthesis of the current knowledge of a topic. It should compare and relate different theories/research, findings, and so on, rather than just summarize them individually. It should also have a particular focus or theme to organize the review. In this section, the researcher can describe some of the related previous studies. Researchers can review the gaps in the research, then it can be used as a basis for research to be carried out
In this section, each researcher is expected to be able to make the most recent contribution related to the solution to the existing problems. Researchers can also use images, diagrams, and flowcharts to explain the solutions to these problems.
In this section, the researcher will explain the results of the research obtained. Researchers can also use images, tables, and curves to explain the results of the study. These results should present the raw data or the results after applying the techniques outlined in the methods section. The results are simply results; they do not conclude.
In this section, the researchers can give a simple discussion related to the results of the research trials. This section contains the author's opinion about the research results obtained. Common features of the discussion section include the comparison between measured and modeled data or comparison among various modeling methods, the results obtained to solve a specific engineering or scientific problem, and further explanation of new and significant findings
Conclusion and Suggestion
The conclusion contains a summary of what is learned from the results obtained, and what needs to be improved in further study. Other common features of the conclusions are the benefits and applications of the research, limitation, and recommendations based on the results obtained.
References must have 15 at least 5 years of sources and the citation and references use APA 6Th Edition formatting style.
Note:Please note a few important components: (use certain tools to help you)
1. English Translation
2. Level of Plagiarism
3. Template Suitability
4. Author must provide Plagiarism Check and Proofreading when Editor request